Print

[Grendel]

This is proven fact that you sure as hell don't.  I'm using your words.
This is proven fact that you sure as hell don't.

im glad Chris likes to prove my point for me.

[ChrisCrusher]

im glad Chris likes to prove my point for me.

I don't get what you're talking about.  You always cut people down saying they don't know what they're talking about, then when people ask you for your side of the argument, you post nonsense.  I mean, we get it, you're a lawyer, no one can argue with a lawyer, because you're ALWAYS RIGHT!  All I ask, is if you're going to be a dick about someone elses opinion, at least show enough respect to argue with some fact or at least some mildly relevant heresay instead of just spouting out garbage.  If you're shooting to be the 'bad guy', you're doing a terrible job.

I'm just saying this because you seem to be the #1 advocate for, let's get people to sign up!  And then are #1 at saying, your opinion is stupid, and here's why, then offer NOTHING in the why department.

[brittneybush]

I missed you guys.

[Thunderbird]

I missed you guys.

What did you miss? Be specific- this portion of the exam is worth 5 points.

[Grendel]

I don't get what you're talking about.  You always cut people down saying they don't know what they're talking about, then when people ask you for your side of the argument, you post nonsense.  I mean, we get it, you're a lawyer, no one can argue with a lawyer, because you're ALWAYS RIGHT!  All I ask, is if you're going to be a dick about someone elses opinion, at least show enough respect to argue with some fact or at least some mildly relevant heresay instead of just spouting out garbage.  If you're shooting to be the 'bad guy', you're doing a terrible job.

I'm just saying this because you seem to be the #1 advocate for, let's get people to sign up!  And then are #1 at saying, your opinion is stupid, and here's why, then offer NOTHING in the why department.

whoa buddy chill.  nowhere have i said i wanted to prove any point anywhere. all of my statement in this thread have been utter nonsense (other than MAYBE my very first one...but even that, without a 6 page refutation of Drew's original point with numerous SCOTUS citations and playing devil's advocate on numerous levels, including stating that my opinion of the law and how it should and historically has been defined/applied is not the same as SCOTUS currently defines it in the Roberts/Scalia/Alito/Thomas conundrum of Constructionists is pretty much nonsense) and if you are reading into them, you are confusing my posts for something else. i can have a long discussion on civil liberties, but not right now.

[Grendel]

which, by the way, if you look at most of my posts for the last month, they have been utter nonsense actually. other than asking about venues, i dont think ive had a serious post. ive checked out from this board since ive been moving and dont have time to read everything. when was the last time ive seen any of you other than evan? i cant wait to be back on the hill.